This section features a selection of videos that help trace the evolution of ideas, revisit the history of the crop circle phenomenon, and explore the hypothesis of a non-identified intelligence on Earth.
More recent videos shed light on major discoveries around the world that may be related to these phenomena.
Some videos are included to broaden perspectives, even if we cannot confirm the accuracy of the facts presented or fully endorse the interpretations put forward.
UFOs: WHAT MILITARY ARCHIVES REVEAL | ALEXANDRE SHELDON-DUPLAIX | THE PARANORMAL SHOW
In this interview published on
September 25, 2026 by
The Paranormal Show,
naval historian
Alexandre Sheldon-Duplaix
looks back on more than twenty-five years of research
devoted to military archives concerning the UFO phenomenon.
A researcher at the
French Defense Historical Service,
a former naval analyst and a specialist in the Cold War,
he approaches the subject using the methods of a historian:
official documents, military archives and witness testimony.
Alexandre Sheldon-Duplaix is a naval historian
specializing in combat fleets,
submarines and maritime strategy,
particularly during the Cold War.
A researcher at the French Defense Historical Service
since 1999, he previously worked for
twelve years as a naval analyst under contract
with the French Navy. He also teaches
naval history.
Long skeptical about the UFO phenomenon,
he explains that he gradually began studying
the subject through
thousands of official military documents and archives,
including those from the American
Sign, Grudge and Blue Book projects.
The interview notably revisits
Roswell,
Colonel Philip Corso,
the Robertson Panel,
the Condon Report,
the Majestic 12 documents
and the various disinformation strategies
historically used by military organizations.
A significant part of the interview also concerns
the
Soviet and Russian archives
consulted by Alexandre Sheldon-Duplaix,
as well as testimony gathered from
former Soviet officials and military personnel.
He notably discusses observations made
at sea, various luminous phenomena reported
around military vessels,
as well as several cases involving
American and Soviet
nuclear installations.
The interview also covers contemporary
developments in the UAP issue in the United States,
including statements made by
David Grusch,
Christopher Mellon
and various military witnesses.
What makes this interview particularly interesting
is the method employed:
returning to archives, military documents
and historical testimony rather than relying
solely on contemporary interpretations of the phenomenon.
UAP: SIX SPHERICAL OBJECTS FILMED BY A MILITARY PLATFORM | AARO
This footage, officially released by U.S.
authorities, comes from a report submitted by
United States Central Command
to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office — AARO.
The video, recorded in
2025
by an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military
platform, shows several areas of contrast
tracked by the sensor.
The associated report describes
six small spherical objects grouped together,
whose behavior is described as
“agile”,
with frequent changes in direction.
According to the official information accompanying
the video,
United States Central Command
submitted a report to AARO concerning
an unidentified anomalous phenomenon observed
from a U.S. military platform
in 2025.
The file contains approximately
one minute of infrared footage.
The associated mission report,
referenced as DOW-UAP-D108,
describes the phenomenon as consisting of
six small spherical objects grouped together.
Their behavior was described by the reporter
as appearing
“agile”,
with
frequent changes in direction.
The speed of the phenomenon was estimated
by the reporter at approximately
480 miles per hour.
The official page describes the sequence
as follows:
00:00 — 00:04:
no content.
00:05 — 00:10:
several areas of contrast move across
the sensor's field of view, entering from
the top of the frame and exiting at the bottom.
00:11 — 00:47:
the sensor pans in order to track
these areas of contrast and keep them
approximately in the center of the frame.
00:48 — 01:00:
the sensor changes its level
of magnification.
IMPORTANT:
AARO explicitly states that this description
is provided for informational purposes only.
It should not be interpreted as an analytical
judgment, investigative conclusion or factual
determination regarding the validity, nature
or significance of the observed phenomenon.
Certain information has also been redacted
in order to protect the identity of witnesses,
the location of government facilities,
or sensitive military information
unrelated to the UAP phenomenon.
UAP: FILTERING OUT THE NOISE TO IDENTIFY SIGNIFICANT CASES | JACQUES VALLÉE | NEWSNATION & REALITY CHECK
In this interview broadcast on
September 15, 2026 on
Reality Check,
Jacques Vallée looks back on nearly six decades
of research devoted to UFO/UAP phenomena.
Beyond the most spectacular aspects of the conversation,
what particularly interests us here are his remarks on
research methodology:
how can we work with an immense and heterogeneous body of data,
eliminate noise and explainable cases,
and then search for the structures that remain?
A problem that directly echoes the difficulties
encountered in the study of crop circles.
This video can also be listened to in many languages thanks to the AI-generated dubbed audio tracks available on YouTube. Simply select the desired audio language in the video settings.
Jacques Vallée is an astrophysicist,
computer scientist and long-standing researcher
of the UFO/UAP phenomenon.
In this interview with
Ross Coulthart,
he discusses, among other things, a vast database
created as part of a program funded by
the Defense Intelligence Agency and containing
approximately
260,000 sightings.
What particularly interests us here
is not the sheer quantity of accumulated data,
but the way Vallée approaches its analysis.
He explains that, in some catalogs,
up to 95% of cases can receive
a conventional explanation.
The objective is therefore not simply
to keep adding more and more sightings,
but first to
clean, verify and qualify the data
before attempting to extract a meaningful structure.
Vallée had planned a stage of analysis
using artificial intelligence in order
to help test possible explanations
and considerably reduce the size of the corpus.
His ultimate objective, however, was above all
to identify what he calls the
“invariants” of the phenomenon:
the characteristics that continue to appear
once noise, errors and explainable cases
have been removed.
It is precisely at this point that this interview
becomes particularly interesting for Culture-Crop.
Jacques Vallée does not discuss crop circles here,
and we are not suggesting a direct connection
between the two phenomena.
The methodological difficulty, however,
is comparable:
within an immense and extremely heterogeneous corpus,
how can we identify the rare elements that may
contain a genuinely significant structure?
Artificial intelligence can become
an extremely powerful tool for identifying
relationships, comparing data or testing
hypotheses.
But it cannot, by itself,
transform a poorly qualified corpus,
contaminated by false positives or built
from unreliable data,
into relevant information.
The problem is therefore not simply to analyze
more data, but first to determine
which data actually deserve to be analyzed.
Later in the interview,
Jacques Vallée also suggests that UAP research
may until now have been working
“at the wrong level”,
and that it may be necessary to change
the way we approach the phenomenon
rather than simply continuing
to accumulate observations.
Key passages:
from 12 min 35 sec:
data filtering and the use of AI.
From 14 min 52 sec:
searching for structure and invariants.
From 28 min 58 sec:
the idea that we may be working
“at the wrong level.”
The interview also discusses much more extraordinary
testimony that is currently difficult to verify.
Those claims are not the main reason
why we selected this video.
TRIPLE JULIA SET: EXPLORING A NEW RESEARCH PATH THROUGH SOUND | MAURO ARBIZA
Can the structure of a crop circle
be transformed into a musical sequence?
Uruguayan musician
Mauro Arbiza experimented with this idea
using the Triple Julia Set:
different circle sizes are associated
with musical notes, and their sequence along
each of the three arms is then transcribed
into MIDI software.
What interests us here is not validating
the interpretation proposed around this music,
but the idea itself: using sound as
another way of exploring the structure
of a formation.
The method begins by identifying
several different
circle sizes
within the formation.
A musical note is then assigned
to each size.
The geometric sequence of circles
therefore becomes a
sequence of notes
for each arm of the Triple Julia.
Mauro Arbiza then transfers these sequences
into MIDI software and assigns
different instruments and registers
in order to create an audible composition.
Part of the musical realization
therefore necessarily depends on human choices:
the correspondence between circle sizes and notes,
instruments, note duration, volume and orchestration.
For this reason, we prefer to describe the process
as a musical transposition
or sonification of the structure,
rather than considering that the existence
of an encoded musical message has been demonstrated.
The experiment nevertheless remains interesting:
it offers a way to observe — and above all,
to listen to — a formation from an unusual
perspective, and as such represents
an additional avenue of research.
The video presented above allows you to listen
for approximately three minutes to the composition
produced from the
Triple Julia Set.
A second video by
Vicente Fuentes
presents the broader approach
and also explores other formations,
including several Julia Sets.
WATCH THE EXPLANATORY VIDEO
Including these videos in our selection does not
imply endorsement of the interpretations they propose.
What interests us here is the experimental approach
of converting a geometric structure
into a sound sequence.
AI: WHO FUNDS THE INFLUENCERS? | Dr Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder is a German theoretical physicist,
PhD in physics and a specialist in the foundations of physics.
She is also well known for her scientific outreach work
and for her critical perspective on some scientific and technological claims.
In this video, she looks at a much less visible phenomenon:
the funding of content creators in order to influence the public debate
about artificial intelligence, both among its supporters
and among those warning about its potential dangers.
In this video published in September 2026,
Sabine Hossenfelder reveals that she was contacted by an
organization offering to pay her to make a video about the
existential risks of artificial intelligence.
The proposal went much further than ordinary sponsorship:
according to her account, she was given the topic to discuss,
references to use and even some of the sentences she was expected to say.
She declined.
As she investigated further, she found that this kind of funding
was not an isolated case. Several organizations supporting strict
regulation of AI fund or support content intended to raise awareness
of the risks associated with the technology.
She mentions the Center for AI Safety,
Control AI and the Future of Life Institute.
But her criticism is not limited to opponents or critics of AI.
She points out that major companies in the field,
including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Perplexity,
have also been using social media and partnerships with creators
to promote the benefits of their technologies.
In her view, the main problem is therefore not that an organization
or company funds a communication campaign.
What becomes much more problematic is the
boundary between independent information, advertising,
communication and lobbying, especially when the source
of the funding is not clearly visible to the public.
She also mentions Build American AI, an organization
that reportedly offered creators several thousand dollars to publish
content portraying Chinese progress in artificial intelligence
as a threat to American jobs.
Sabine Hossenfelder is therefore not trying to decide here whether
artificial intelligence will save humanity or put it in danger.
Her message is different:
the debate itself has become a field of influence.
When faced with a video that is highly enthusiastic about AI,
or on the contrary extremely alarmist, she encourages viewers
to ask an additional question:
who may be funding this content, and why?
An interesting reflection on the way
scientific and technological information can be influenced,
sometimes very discreetly, by economic, associative or political interests.
UFOS: IS TRUMP'S DECLASSIFICATION A FLOP? | NURÉA
In this program broadcast on August 26, 2026,
NURÉA brings together Sarah Witeneim, Fabrice Bonvin and Stéphane Royer
to review the latest series of documents and videos made public
in the United States concerning the UFO/UAP phenomenon.
The guests compare their analyses of the real significance of these releases,
the sometimes surprising quality of the material made public,
and what these documents may nevertheless teach us about the history of the subject.
Solar Storms, Coronal Holes and Forecasting | Dr Tamitha Skov
In this particularly educational video, space weather specialist
Dr Tamitha Skov shows how scientists observe the Sun
and attempt to forecast the effects of its activity on Earth.
She explains in particular the role of coronal holes
and the solar wind, showing how observations and models allow scientists
to follow a solar environment that is far more complex than it may appear.
In this forecast published on August 11, 2026,
Dr Tamitha Skov analyzes two solar storms heading
toward Earth: one expected to hit directly, while the second
should deliver only a glancing blow.
A particularly interesting part of her explanation concerns
coronal holes. These regions of the solar corona
can be difficult to distinguish depending on the wavelength used
to observe the Sun. They are associated with open magnetic field
lines through which fast solar wind can escape.
Tamitha Skov shows an extremely elongated coronal hole producing
solar wind that could approach 500 km/s. Several
coronal holes surround the region from which the Earth-directed
solar storm erupted. The fast solar wind associated with them can
influence its propagation and give it an additional push.
This also provides an opportunity to understand an essential idea:
a solar storm does not travel through an empty and uniform
space. It propagates through an environment already filled
with solar wind, magnetic structures and other phenomena capable
of influencing its evolution.
The video also shows how researchers attempt to
forecast space weather. Observations from different
instruments and spacecraft make it possible to reconstruct a broad
view of the Sun, including the monitoring of some regions on its
far side. Models from NOAA and NASA
are then compared to estimate the trajectory, speed and arrival time
of solar storms.
Tamitha Skov finally discusses their possible effects: auroras,
disruptions to radio communications, propagation conditions, GPS,
and the radiation environment for aviation. She thus reminds us that
studying the Sun is not simply about observing spectacular phenomena:
it is a genuine science of observation, modelling and
forecasting.
An excellent introduction to discovering the Sun as a
complex dynamic system whose behaviour we are
gradually learning to understand.
Rendlesham Forest Incident: New Information in 2026 | Simon Holland
There has been a widely held belief that the Rendlesham Forest Incident (RFI) was an episode concerning the American tactical air force presence at the joint bases of Bentwaters and Woodbridge. In the light of new information (2026) received by Simon Holland, who has done extensive research into the RFI, it now appears that the twin bases were actually a setting for something far stranger.
In his account here Simon Holland proposes that an Agency, superior to the usual three letter organisations; CIA, NSA, etc., had embarked on a serious attempt to contact Non Human Intelligences (NHI).
These would have been easier to call up in Suffolk, and particularly in the area around Rendlesham, as it appears that the 'veil' between dimensions is at its thinnest here (Colonel Charles Halt describes it as a kind of 'portal').
It is proposed that this 'Agency' was seeking to profit from such a contact in order to gain an advantage technologically (weaponise) over potential present, or future adversaries.
Simon Holland describes the presence of a tunnel linking the Cobra Mist installation on Orford Ness to secret laboratories under RAF Woodbridge airbase, not dissimilar to CERN.
He says here that all this was happening without the knowledge of the American air force personnel working above ground on the twin bases.
In December 1980, the contact with NHI eventually happened and went horribly wrong, injuring airmen off the base.
The deputy base commander Charles Halt, who was caught up in the events, was just as much shocked as everyone else by the weird things which were evoked and brought into being by the experiment.
UFOs: An Air Force General Breaks the Silence | Bruno Mignot | THE PARANORMAL SHOW
In this interview, General Bruno Mignot, a former French Air Force pilot and former director of the National Air Operations Centre, discusses an unexplained encounter he experienced while flying, as well as several observations of unidentified aerial phenomena reported in a military context.
His testimony is particularly interesting because it does not focus solely on the origin of the objects observed. He also discusses how pilots, radar systems and military institutions can be confronted with phenomena that do not readily fit into conventional categories.
During the interview, Bruno Mignot recounts an unexplained aerial encounter and describes an object whose presence was reportedly signalled as dangerous converging traffic. The discussion then turns to the limitations of radar detection, the occultation of stars by some observed phenomena, and behaviours which, in certain cases, appear difficult to reconcile with conventional aeronautical capabilities.
The General also addresses the credibility of military testimony, the role of GEIPAN, and the procedures available to pilots when they observe an aerial phenomenon they are unable to identify.
Another important aspect of the interview concerns institutional preparedness. According to Bruno Mignot, pilots do not necessarily receive specific training for this type of situation, even though some phenomena may potentially raise issues of air safety or national defence.
The discussion then broadens to information warfare, influence and crisis management. Bruno Mignot explains how the perception of an event can be altered by the way information is presented, how a subject can be discredited through association, and how a poorly managed situation can become a source of destabilisation.
The interview also covers state secrecy, the credibility of military sources, incursions over nuclear sites, international cooperation, drones, artificial intelligence applied to weapons systems, and the possibility that the UFO phenomenon itself could be used as a tool of cognitive warfare or psychological panic.
The significance of this interview therefore extends well beyond the question of the origin of UAP. It raises a broader question: how can a military institution and a State identify, analyse and manage a phenomenon that falls outside their usual categories?
And above all: what would happen if, one day, this phenomenon became sufficiently obvious that it could no longer be treated as a simple “non-issue”?
Ancient Aliens: Crop Circle Challenge Accepted | History Channel
In this television experiment, a team attempts to recreate the Golden Ball Hill (2005) crop circle, a formation approximately 96 feet in diameter that originally appeared overnight.
Their objective: demonstrate that a complex pattern can be reproduced by humans in just a few hours using boards (“stompers”) and a drone to monitor the geometry from above.
This episode of Ancient Aliens echoes the challenge launched back in 2007 on our former Culture-crop.com website: publicly showing the actual condition of oilseed rape after mechanical flattening.
Here is their conclusion: the final result is considered visually very convincing. From above, the reconstruction strongly resembles the original pattern, proving that some crop circle designs can indeed be reproduced using relatively simple methods.
However, the documentary then introduces an essential nuance that is often forgotten: what intrigues researchers is not only the aerial appearance of the formations, but also their ground structure.
In the case of the genuine Golden Ball Hill crop circle, several observations are highlighted:
• the flowers were not broken;
• the stems appeared gently laid down;
• the overall arrangement looked almost “woven” or delicately placed without visible mechanical damage.
The participants themselves acknowledge that this level of finish does not really resemble a simple mechanical flattening process made with boards.
This distinction is important: reproducing the general appearance of a crop circle from the air does not necessarily mean reproducing all the biological and physical details observed in certain historical formations.

Here is the visual taken from our Culture-crop.com website and reused in this TV episode to illustrate the condition of the stems between the original 2005 formation and the board-made reproduction created in 2015.
Our GOLDEN BALL HILL 2005 file
THE OILSEED RAPE CHALLENGE — ARCHIVE VERSION OF THE OLD WEBSITE
Crop Circles Archive: this crop circle was made using boards — Wilton Windmill, May 2010 (Wiltshire)
In 2010, Robert Hulse documented the particularly damaged condition of an oilseed rape field after the passage of hoaxers.
Their goal was to mislead people interested in crop circles.
William Betts also archived the site 56 days later. This archive video now allows comparisons between the actual condition of the oilseed rape and other historical formations such as Golden Ball Hill 2005, whose ground structure appeared completely different.
(Above: image extracted from the original video, then faithfully restored and enhanced by AI to better visualize the condition of the flowers and stems.)
UFO Disclosure... a historic declassification?
with Sarah Witeneim, Stéphane Royer and Fabrice Bonvin - NUREA TV
French UFO program from NUREA TV discussing the May 2026 declassification of UFO/UAP documents by the United States government.
The discussion explores political, military and cultural aspects of the disclosure process, Apollo testimonies, classified archives, retro-engineering programs and the growing role of science fiction in the public perception of the phenomenon.
Automatic subtitles and translations may be available through YouTube or Google tools.
DISCLOSURE DAY | Official Trailer [In theaters 10.06.2026]
Official trailer for Disclosure Day, the film mentioned during the French NUREA TV program dedicated to the recent UFO/UAP document declassification.
Without revealing the plot, the trailer suggests an atmosphere combining disclosure, geopolitical tension, military secrecy and questions surrounding humanity’s relationship with the unknown.
WAR.GOV / UFO
Official U.S. government disclosure portal
Official U.S. government portal dedicated to the publication and declassification of UFO/UAP-related archives.
The website gradually gathers official reports, historical files, testimonies, videos and visual material released as part of the ongoing disclosure process initiated in 2026.
AARO.MIL
All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
Official website of the AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office), the U.S. Department of Defense office dedicated to the investigation of unidentified aerial, maritime and spatial phenomena.
The agency centralizes reports, analysis and official evaluations concerning anomalous observations detected across multiple operational domains.
Megaliths, Sun and cosmic cycles
Alternative reading of ancient structures and cosmic time
Stefan Burns hosts Heather Ensworth
A discussion about cosmic cycles, the role of the Sun, and the hypothesis that megaliths may reflect an ancient reading of the sky.
This conversation presents a reading of the sky based on the idea that cosmic time could function like a clock made of several interlocking gears. The speakers discuss different levels of cycles — a precessional cycle of about 24,000 years, intermediate cycles of 12,000, 6,000 and 1,500 years, as well as planetary cycles — which, when combined, could form a coherent and repetitive temporal structure. In this approach, the Sun occupies a central position and may be seen as a pivot of the system, through which broader cosmic dynamics are expressed.
Megaliths are presented as structures that may reflect these cycles. According to this hypothesis, they would not only be cultural or ritual constructions, but also markers aligned with certain stars and based on intentional geometry. This geometry could be interpreted as a language, while the cycles would carry the message, turning ancient monuments into a form of sky memory written in stone.
The discussion also explores the idea that variations in solar and cosmic activity could accompany certain periods of transformation in human history. These proposals remain debated and sometimes controversial within the classical scientific framework, especially when they involve broader hypotheses about the interaction between cosmic cycles and human history.
Although crop circles are not explicitly mentioned, this framework may evoke other forms of geometric expression observed on the surface of the Earth. From this perspective, if megaliths may be considered as a memory of the sky based on geometry and cycles, some contemporary formations could, conditionally, be interpreted as belonging to a comparable register: structured geometry, potentially carrying information, placed within a precise temporal and cosmic context.
45th President of the United States – Donald Trump and UFO files
Source: New York Post – April 2026
This site remains apolitical: only the subject itself is considered.
Link to YOUTUBE or local VIDEO excerpt
In this excerpt from the New York Post, the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, mentions when the first documents related to UFO phenomena could be released.
This video, released by the New York Post, presents a statement by Donald Trump about the announced release of early documents related to UFO phenomena. The interest of this excerpt lies less in an immediate revelation than in the fact that a subject long kept at the margins is now being mentioned in a highly visible political and media context.
In the context of April 2026, this statement belongs to a broader sequence in which the question of archives, official documents and transparency around unidentified aerial phenomena regularly returns to public debate. The video can therefore be viewed as a media marker: it shows that the subject continues to move gradually from the margins into a more visible space of discussion.
This selection does not necessarily validate the announced content or the political intentions associated with it. Its purpose is mainly to preserve a record of a moment when the question of UFO files was publicly formulated, with a promise of release and an expectation around documents still to come.
Phoenix Lights – Giant UFO observed in 1997
Analysis by Lionel and ufologist Franck Maurin
On March 13, 1997, a giant V-shaped UFO, estimated to be about 1.6 km long, was observed by hundreds of witnesses in the skies over Phoenix, Arizona.
Lionel and ufologist Franck Maurin revisit this remarkable event known as the “Phoenix Lights”.
The speakers emphasize that this was not an isolated sighting but a large-scale event reported by hundreds of people, including police officers, military personnel, officials, and civilians.
At the center of the accounts is a massive, silent object described as a V- or boomerang-shaped structure moving slowly across Arizona and the Phoenix area. Its size was described as extraordinary, with some witnesses estimating it at around 1.6 km in length. Several observers also reported aligned lights forming a geometric structure in the night sky.
They point out that the official explanation involving military flares does not fully account for all observations. While flares may explain some later lights, they do not match the horizontal movement, silence, and scale of the reported object. Flares typically descend with parachutes, produce smoke, and do not behave like a structured craft.
The event was also marked by the reaction of authorities. Arizona governor Fife Symington initially mocked the case publicly before later acknowledging that he himself had witnessed something unexplained.
For the speakers, the Phoenix Lights remain a major case due to the number of witnesses, the consistency of reports, the existence of video evidence, and the difficulty of reducing the entire event to a single conventional explanation.
Phoenix Lights – video archive (USA, 1997)
Source: filmed testimony – Carefree, Arizona
YouTube link
This video, filmed on March 13, 1997 around 8:30 PM in Carefree (Arizona), shows a V-shaped light formation associated with the Phoenix Lights event.
This sequence is presented as one of the few recordings from the evening of March 13, 1997 showing a V-shaped light formation. It was reportedly captured by an anonymous witness in Carefree, Arizona.
Several lights can be seen moving slowly in a stable geometric formation. At times, one light appears to detach and rejoin the group, a behavior reported by multiple witnesses.
Some testimonies describe a semi-solid or translucent structure, with the lights outlining its shape. Other reports mention large dark craft moving slowly and silently at low altitude.
Data collected by organizations such as NUFORC describe formations covering significant portions of the sky, moving along coherent trajectories at unusual speeds.
This video is part of a broader set of observations that make the Phoenix Lights one of the most documented and debated UFO cases.
1980 Rendlesham Forest UFO event
An important interview with the late Nick Pope
1980 Rendlesham Forest UFO event.
An important interview with the late Nick Pope.
In this video we listen to one of the most credible witnesses to the 1980 Rendlesham Forest incident, Jim Penniston, as he tells his story. The exchanges between the presenter and Nick Pope are excellent, sincere and always on topic. It is about the most interesting, genuine and informative account of this event to be found. Unmissable.
1980 Rendlesham Forest UFO event
An interview with deputy Bentwaters base commander colonel Charles Halt
1980 Rendlesham Forest UFO event.
An interview with deputy Bentwaters base commander colonel Charles Halt.
Colonel Charles Halt tells us what happened on the second night of the Rendlesham Forest incident. He had been made aware of Jim Pennistons experience on the night 25/26 December, and was at the Bentwaters base two nights later when he was called away from whatever he was doing and told, 'Sir, its back! He drove out into the forest to experience for himself what was to become one of the most amazing and well documented UFO encounters of all time.
ROUNDTABLE – Crop Circles
Lucy Pringle & guests (YouTube)
A roundtable-style discussion focused on crop circles: field observations, the evolution of the phenomenon, observation methods, and open questions. Lucy Pringle contributes her experience in archives and photography, and the conversation remains accessible even to a non-specialist audience.
Discussion focus
Rather than promoting a single explanation, this roundtable highlights
the practical obstacles that still prevent a clear and shared
understanding of the crop circle phenomenon today.
Obstacle #1: the impossibility of establishing a reliable proportion
All participants acknowledge the existence of human-made formations.
However, they emphasize that it is impossible to prove an overall proportion
(such as “90%” or “98%”) without direct observation of the moment of formation.
Figures commonly cited in public debate therefore rely on assertions,
rarely on verifiable evidence.
Obstacle #2: increasingly restricted access to fields
Field investigation is complicated by legal constraints
(private property, permissions), growing fatigue among some farmers,
and tensions that have developed over the years.
Yet the most relevant physical indicators
(stem condition, breakage, traces, displaced seeds)
can only be observed if researchers are among the very first on site,
which has become increasingly rare.
Obstacle #3: the time factor
Several cases discussed suggest formations appearing within
a very short time frame, sometimes within a few tens of minutes.
This temporal factor complicates any demonstration,
as it is rarely possible to have instruments,
multiple witnesses, and independent data
at exactly the right place and time.
Obstacle #4: fear of ridicule
A major recurring barrier is the reluctance of the academic world
to engage with the subject.
Fear of being discredited or marginalized
discourages many active researchers from addressing it openly.
Existing studies often come from independent researchers
or scientists late in their careers,
limiting continuity and institutional recognition.
Obstacle #5: the cost of analysis
Serious biological or physical analyses
(comparisons of stems, soils, seeds)
involve high costs, often incompatible
with independent research efforts.
Without stable funding,
it is difficult to implement reproducible protocols
across a large number of formations.
Obstacle #6: inaccessibility of decisive data
Participants raise the possibility that key data
(satellite imagery, aerial surveillance, institutional archives)
may exist but remain inaccessible to the public or researchers.
Without such data, the elements that could clearly resolve the issue
remain out of reach.
Obstacle #7: disturbances during measurement attempts
Several testimonies mention equipment malfunctions
(cameras, computers, drones, agricultural machinery)
within or near certain formations.
Regardless of the cause,
these disturbances complicate the collection of reliable data
at the very moment when it would be most crucial.
A shared stance
In the face of these obstacles, the roundtable adopts a cautious position:
describe what is observed, identify limitations,
and accept that some questions remain open.
The goal is not to reach conclusions at all costs,
but to establish an honest methodological framework
between automatic dismissal and uncritical acceptance.
DR TAMITHA SKOV
Space Weather Woman
Space weather bulletin – recent solar activity (27/06/2026)
In this bulletin, astrophysicist Tamitha Skov analyzes the recent evolution of solar activity and its concrete impacts: solar storms, fast wind from coronal holes, radio risks, radiation conditions, and aurora probabilities at high and mid latitudes.
Overall state of solar activity
The bulletin shows a phase of gradual calming
following a period of intense activity,
marked by a G4-level solar storm and several recent eruptions.
The main active regions responsible for these events
are now rotating toward the far side of the Sun,
reducing immediate risks for Earth.
Coronal holes and fast solar wind
A clearly visible coronal hole is generating a stream of fast solar wind
capable of producing unstable geomagnetic conditions
for several days.
Minor storms remain possible,
particularly at high latitudes,
with more moderate activity expected at mid latitudes.
Radio forecasts and flares
The risk of daytime radio blackouts is decreasing.
The probability of M-class flares remains limited,
while the risk of X-class flares drops rapidly
to very low levels.
Radio amateurs and emergency services benefit from
a favorable window of relief for communications.
Radiation and aviation
Radiation levels remain temporarily elevated,
due to residual shocks and particles from previous storms.
Satellite operators, particularly in geostationary orbit,
should remain alert to still-high electron fluxes.
Conditions are nevertheless expected to return to normal
in the coming days.
Auroras and short-term outlook
Auroras remain possible at high latitudes
around the 27–29 period,
with a lower but non-zero chance
at mid latitudes during substorm episodes.
Over the longer term, solar activity is expected to remain moderate
until new active regions rotate back
from the far side of the Sun.
This bulletin illustrates Tamitha Skov’s educational approach:
connecting real-time solar observations, satellite data,
and their concrete impacts on technology, aviation,
and terrestrial communications.
Crop Circles & Sacred Sites
Eric Leskowitz (New Thinking Allowed)
Eric Leskowitz, M.D., psychiatrist and researcher affiliated with Harvard Medical School, offers here a reflection on sacred sites in England and the phenomenon of crop circles, through an approach combining integrative medicine, perception, and consciousness.
Approach presented in the video
Eric Leskowitz discusses the existence of energetic,
geophysical, and informational patterns linked to certain
megalithic sites (Avebury, Stonehenge) and some crop circle formations.
His perspective is part of a broader reflection on the
biofield, human perception, and phenomena
that remain poorly explained by classical models.
Broader research context
While exploring historical archives related to
crop circles, evidence emerges of scientific discussions as early
as the late 1980s, where the subject was approached within an
interdisciplinary framework combining meteorology,
atmospheric physics, and aerospace phenomena.
Joachim Kuettner (meteorology)
These exchanges notably mention Joachim Kuettner,
meteorologist and specialist in atmospheric phenomena (UCAR),
whose work focuses on complex interactions between atmosphere,
terrain, and natural structures.
Jacques Vallée & Jean-Jacques Velasco
In this same context also appear
Jacques Vallée and
Jean-Jacques Velasco, from different fields
(computer science, astronomy, institutional investigations).
This does not imply a shared position or official validation
of the crop circle phenomenon, but rather reflects the
reality of occasional exchanges between researchers
confronted with data that are difficult to categorize.
Archival document (context)
The photograph below is presented as a
contextual document.
It does not constitute proof of the precise content of the discussions,
but attests to the reality of interdisciplinary scientific exchanges
during that period.
Society for Scientific Exploration (SSE)
The Society for Scientific Exploration (SSE) is an
independent scientific organization founded in 1982,
dedicated to the study of phenomena that remain poorly understood
or insufficiently integrated into traditional academic frameworks.
It focuses in particular on topics such as
consciousness, UAP,
informational interactions,
emerging models of intelligence (including AI),
and more broadly on questions located at the frontiers of established science.
The SSE does not claim to provide definitive answers, but offers an
open space for reflection and research through
conferences, publications, and interdisciplinary exchanges.
Official website:
https://scientificexploration.org
Alton Barnes Hills and Village flythrough by Drone 4K
Landscape references – drone flyover
This 4K drone flyover offers a visual journey through the Pewsey Valley, and more specifically around Alton Barnes, an emblematic area for observing landscapes and relief features.
The video makes it easier to observe slopes, access points, ridgelines, and distances than on Google Earth, with less landscape distortion and a more vivid perception of the terrain.
Context
The video’s author, Matthew Williams, has long
taken a skeptical stance, at times very critical of field researchers.
Nevertheless, this video remains an excellent landscape
reference tool, useful for anyone wishing to observe the
area closely before or after an on-site visit.
“The military don’t want us here!”
Military helicopters, crop circle and luminous sphere
Documentary excerpt featuring Colin Andrews,
Charlie Mallett and Ian Christopher. The footage shows military
helicopters flying over a crop circle, apparently following a
small luminous sphere close to the ground.
Witnesses feel that the military do not want civilian observers on site,
even though they seem highly interested in what is happening in the field.
What the footage shows
Colin Andrews recounts an investigation into a crop circle near
Alton Barnes. Researchers — including a French scientist
working for the U.S. government — arrive to document the formation.
Very quickly, a military helicopter flies in at very low
altitude, performs manoeuvres described as intimidating,
and appears to film the group on the ground.
A second aircraft (Lynx / Gazelle type) then arrives and positions itself over the field.
In the footage, investigators notice a small luminous sphere
moving close to the ground, which the helicopter seems to search for and follow,
sometimes with a halo or bright point appearing beneath the aircraft.
Andrews later mentions other cases where
military helicopters pursue luminous spheres over fields,
stressing that these overflights mainly target the non-identified formations:
according to him, the military seem able to distinguish real cases from
obvious hoaxes and do not bother with clearly human-made designs.
General tone in the comments
The reception is very warm for Eyes On Cinema:
– Many welcome the channel’s return and call this
“one of its most interesting videos”.
– Several viewers are struck by the helicopters + orb combination,
seeing it as a “key moment” in the subject.
– Others recall that older footage showing luminous spheres
forming crop circles disappeared from YouTube, reinforcing the idea of
sensitive or inconvenient material.
On the nature of crop circles
– Many commenters insist it is “impossible” for some designs to be
made “by a few guys with boards and ropes” overnight, especially in exposed fields.
– Some describe the formations as true works of art,
far beyond a simple hoax.
– Several personal accounts mention circles where the plants were laid like
a “woven mat”, incompatible with rough mechanical action.
On the role of the military
– Numerous viewers highlight that deploying multiple helicopters,
flying low and aggressively, does not match a “village prank”.
– Many see it as strong evidence that authorities take the phenomenon seriously,
even if the official narrative remains sceptical.
– Some go further, suggesting the military may sometimes participate directly
or possess unreleased data.
More speculative reactions
– A few imagine the luminous spheres as “interstellar pens”
drawing in the fields.
– Others suggest the formations may contain technical diagrams
or craft designs, referencing 3D modelling attempts.
– Many reflect on the ridicule strategy: that the subject
has been deliberately mocked to hide something deeper.
In summary, this clip is widely viewed as a key document:
a rare convergence of visible military presence, witnesses on the ground,
and a recorded luminous anomaly — continuing to fuel debate on the
non-human component of the phenomenon.
Crabwood 2002 – Binary message
“Beware the bearers of false gifts…”
2002:
At the time, nobody talked about the condition of the stalks
or plank marks.
If this formation was made over several days, it was done out of sight,
far from the epicentre, with probable technological assistance.
No field report describes the true condition of the plants.
A post-9/11 message released alongside a rather simplistic Hollywood film (Signs).
A myth crafted to mislead you… for decades!
On 15 August 2002, a spectacular crop circle appeared at Crabwood
(Winchester, Hampshire): a humanoid face accompanied by a huge
horizontal-line disc encoding a binary message decoded by
ASCII specialist Paul Vigay.
What the video shows
The documentary revisits the famous 2002 Crabwood formation:
a portrait built like a television raster image,
and a coded disc organised in bands of varying density.
The binary message decoded by Paul Vigay reads:
“Beware the bearers of false gifts and their broken promises.
Much pain but still time.
There is good out there.
We oppose deception.
Conduit closing.”
Witnesses interviewed on site highlighted:
– the precision of the motif,
– the lack of visible markers from ground level,
– the difficulty of producing such an image in darkness,
– the quality of the lay before footfall damage.
General reaction in the comments
– Many describe this formation as “impossible to create in a few hours”.
– Most express lasting fascination: “chills”, “masterpiece”, “impossible to replicate”.
On the binary message
– Many viewers interpret it as a warning about “false gifts”,
a theme common in modern UFO lore.
– Others mention the reference to a base-twelve numeric system.
– One viewer highlights the line “We oppose deception” as a pointed statement
against manipulation — human or otherwise.
On the hoax hypothesis
– A few sceptics see it as a promotional stunt tied to the release of
Signs (UK release one week later).
– Others disagree: no evidence has ever been produced of a human team capable
of creating such a large, clean pattern overnight.
– Several recall the technical challenges:
thick hedges,
almost zero visibility,
intact stalks,
no team traces.
– A viewer notes: “The stalks were laid like a woven mat.”
On the significance of the motif
– Some compare the disc’s precision to a giant CD-ROM placed in a field.
– Others feel the face seems more like a warning than a teaching.
Summary
For many, Crabwood 2002 remains:
– one of the most iconic crop circles ever recorded,
– a case where aesthetics, technique and message converge,
– a formation whose complexity continues to fuel debate —
with still no detailed report on the condition of the stalks!
CNN – “The Age of Disclosure”
UAPs, NHIs and a contested 80-year cover-up
CNN segment on the documentary “The Age of Disclosure”, in which high-ranking U.S. officials go on record about a possible “80-year global cover-up” surrounding UAPs and non-human intelligence. The tone remains measured, but the topic touches what several commenters describe as “one of the greatest revelations in human history.”
Overall reception
Most comments are very positive. Many describe it as a
“next-level documentary”, on par with James Fox’s work,
and say they watched it with friends or family in
“watch parties.” Some write that it was
“the best money spent in a long time” and recommend it
to “the entire human population.”
Sense of historical revelation
Several viewers see the film as a major step in the long
“drip-drip disclosure” process. Hearing current
and former officials speak directly on camera gives them a feeling
of more official validation. Some feel that it prepares
the public for a “final level of disclosure”,
with potential consequences for how we define what it means to be human.
Price and access
A recurring criticism is the high price of the documentary,
especially for a topic many see as global public interest.
Viewers complain that it is not available in every country on Prime
and call for a release on major platforms like Netflix or, ideally,
for free on YouTube. Others openly say they are waiting for an
unofficial upload.
Media and governments
Many comments criticize legacy media for having ignored
the subject for decades, or for never pushing government officials
with serious questions. Several insist this is
not a partisan issue but a global one. Some ask why
figures like Rubio or Stratton are not interviewed more often
on prime-time news about what they know.
Personal testimonies and “awakening”
A number of people share their own sightings (a childhood encounter,
strange objects in the sky in the 1980s or 1990s, etc.).
For them, the documentary confirms a long-held intuition:
“we are not alone.” Some speak of an
“awakening” or a necessary step toward a broader
cultural shift.
Security and risk concerns
One detailed comment argues that if non-human intelligences are
monitoring our military and nuclear infrastructure,
refusing to acknowledge the phenomenon publicly could be a strategic
risk. The idea is that while nations focus on outmaneuvering one another,
they may be losing precious time to understand a potential
non-human actor. This interpretation is speculative, but clearly
present in the thread.
Internal critiques
A few voices find the documentary very
U.S.-centric, framed by questions like
“what if the other countries get the tech?”, whereas the issue
itself goes far beyond military competition. Others feel that,
for people who already follow the topic closely, the film remains
quite introductory for the price.
In summary
The overall mood is a mix of
enthusiasm, relief and frustration:
– enthusiasm, because many finally feel a form of
public validation;
– relief, because the taboo around the subject seems to be fading;
– frustration, because of the cost, access limitations and the sense
that institutions and major media are still far behind the
conversation actually happening among the public.
NASA – Astronaut Nichole Ayers (ISS)
Red sprite and “gigantic jets” above thunderstorms
On her X account, NASA astronaut Nichole Ayers shared a rare image of a red sprite (and gigantic jets) captured from the ISS above storms between Mexico and the United States.
What exactly are we seeing?
These transient luminous events (TLEs) form above thunderclouds
during intense electrical activity. From orbit, astronauts have a unique vantage point
to capture them and provide data for researchers.
FULL VIDEO ON REDDIT:
NASA astronaut on ISS caught red sprite over Mexico and the U.S. – Reddit
Reactions to the video
The post has triggered hundreds of enthusiastic and curious comments:
– Many call it an “incredible view” and say they had “never seen anything like it.”
– Some argue that images like this should be highlighted much more by major media.
– Several users share their own sightings of strange lights or unexplained phenomena in the sky.
– Discussions sometimes drift toward NASA’s communication strategy and the scientific importance
of these events.
Overall, the mood is a blend of fascination, wonder and scientific curiosity.
Scientific context
– A red sprite is a very brief red flash in the upper atmosphere.
– Gigantic jets are upward electrical discharges connecting
thunderstorms to the ionosphere.
Why do scientists care about TLEs?
– They last only a few milliseconds.
– They reveal the global electrical coupling between storms and the upper atmosphere.
– They are hard to study from the ground, which makes orbital imagery especially valuable.
Why Nichole Ayers’ X account is worth following
– Regular photos of storms, auroras and atmospheric phenomena seen from the ISS.
– A rare visual context that complements ground-based observations.
– A very intuitive way to connect Earth weather and space weather.
ESA – Flying through the biggest solar storm ever recorded
Simulating an extreme solar storm
The European Space Agency (ESA) describes how its teams simulated a Carrington-type solar storm ahead of the launch of the Sentinel-1D satellite. A realistic stress test to probe satellite survival, collision risk management, and the resilience of our orbital infrastructure.
Article title
Flying through the biggest solar storm ever recorded – ESA / Space Safety / Space Weather.
Simulated scenario
ESA teams in Darmstadt rehearsed an extreme scenario inspired by the
1859 Carrington event: a giant solar flare, followed by a stream
of energetic particles and then a massive coronal mass ejection (CME)
striking Earth.
Three key phases
– Phase 1: an X45-class flare disrupts communications, radar systems,
GPS navigation and ground stations, especially at high latitudes.
– Phase 2: minutes later, an intense flux of particles
(protons, electrons, etc.) starts causing errors in satellite electronics
(bit flips, potential permanent failures).
– Phase 3: the CME triggers a major geomagnetic storm:
the atmosphere swells, drag increases sharply, collision risks rise and power grids
on the ground come under severe stress.
Satellite impact
– atmospheric drag can increase by several hundred percent,
– conjunction data and collision forecasts become less reliable,
– GNSS performance degrades, star trackers go “blind”, and on-board
electronics operate under constant stress.
Purpose of the exercise
To test the ability of mission teams to keep satellites safe,
coordinate multiple missions at once and make decisions under deep uncertainty.
ESA stresses that the question is not if such an event will happen,
but when it will occur.
Preparing for the future
The article also introduces Europe’s upcoming space weather tools:
– the D3S (Distributed Space Weather Sensor System) network
to monitor the near-Earth space environment,
– the Vigil mission, which will observe the Sun from Lagrange Point L5
from 2031 onwards, detecting hazardous events before they rotate into direct
Earth view and buying precious time to protect spacecraft and ground infrastructure.
DR TAMITHA SKOV
Space Weather Woman
Live space weather forecasts
An astrophysicist specialising in space weather, Tamitha Skov delivers live briefings structured like operational forecasts: aurora outlooks, geomagnetic storm risks, radio blackout potential and impacts on everyday technology (GPS, satellites, communications).
Briefing structure
In this live forecast, Tamitha Skov uses a clear, operational style:
– BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front): the essentials right at the start
(risk levels, storm strength, aurora visibility).
– Five-day outlooks:
• solar storm and aurora activity,
• dayside radio blackout risk from solar flares,
• radiation storm risk affecting polar aviation and some
communication paths.
– Synopsis of forecast: a short summary of the near-term trends.
– Post-BLUF Q&A and deep dive for viewers who want to understand
the maps, indices and technical details more thoroughly.
Who is it for?
– curious viewers interested in auroras and solar phenomena,
– space and sky-watching enthusiasts,
– users of technologies that are sensitive to space weather,
such as radio amateurs, pilots and operators.
Her approach
Tamitha Skov regularly reminds her audience that space weather already affects:
– GPS and navigation apps,
– drones and high-altitude flights,
– communication networks, satellites, satellite TV and radio.
Her stated goal is to make space weather forecasts as familiar as
the nightly weather report, so that people can anticipate disruptions
instead of being caught off guard.
This live forecast was created by and for her Patreon community —
without their support, briefings like this would not be possible — and is now
available to a wider audience.
Chladni Patterns
Interactive Simulations
By Juan Carlos Ponce Campuzano
This interactive resource shows how sound and vibration give rise to visible geometric shapes — the famous Chladni figures. It revisits the 18th-century experiments of Ernst Chladni and connects them with modern mathematics and physics through real-time simulations of square and circular plates.
Basic Principle
When a plate vibrates, its surface divides into regions moving in opposite directions, separated by nodal lines that remain still.
Fine sand gathers along these stationary lines, revealing elegant geometric patterns — the Chladni figures.
Historical Background
In 1787, Ernst Chladni demonstrated that sound travels in waves by stroking a metal plate with a violin bow covered in sand.
At resonance, the sand arranged itself along the nodal lines, making vibration modes visible for the first time.
Square vs. Circular Plates
For a square plate, modes can be described by sine/cosine functions labeled by two integers (m, n).
For a circular plate, shapes are expressed in polar coordinates using Bessel functions, like a drumhead.
Mathematical Model
Patterns are eigenmodes of an elastic plate governed by the Kirchhoff equation (biharmonic operator + boundary conditions).
Each figure = eigenvalue (frequency) + eigenfunction (shape).
Interactive Simulation
The site approximates figures via a sum of sinusoidal sources (frequency, phase, stiffness).
Open the controls, change plate size or colors, and save your favorite 2D/3D patterns.
SOLARHAM
X5.1 Solar Flare – November 11, 2025
On November 11, 2025, the Sun unleashed an X5.1-class solar flare — one of the strongest of the current solar cycle. The event was detected around Active Region AR4274 and peaked at 10:04 UTC, accompanied by a bright, Earth-directed coronal mass ejection (CME).
BANG! The 6th strongest solar flare of the current solar cycle in terms of peak X-Ray flux, but possibly the most energetic, was detected around AR 4274 peaking at 10:04 UTC (Nov 11). The event reached X5.1 with a wide area of coronal dimming already evident and a bright Earth-directed halo CME now emerging. Energetic proton levels are also on the rise following the flare and a radiation storm warning is now in effect. This event will likely prolong an already expected geomagnetic storm and could push it to the Severe (G4) threshold in the days ahead. Stay tuned to SolarHam.com for more updates.
16 years ago – UFO on CAM Making CROP CIRCLES
Cute, flying over the fields… and yes, it’s an admitted fake.
Just like the “alien” from Crabwood (2002) that drew attention away from the key 2001 formations, these “light balls” — real or staged — are often used to confuse the public. This video (~16 years old) mainly shows how easy it was to create something convincing.
Focusing on orbs alone isn’t enough. Go full investigator mode: source, witnesses, metadata, shot sequence, shadows, weather. Analysis tools often spot fakes, and advanced AIs do it even better — even when the fake comes from them. Like in photography: you can’t pass digital for analog.
Recreating a full “Alton Barnes Cloud” scenario today would take a lot more than a quick trick.
7 years ago
Multiple Orbs tracked over crop circle
Will this video survive an AI scan?
Focusing on orbs alone isn’t enough. Go full investigator mode: source, witnesses, metadata, shot sequence, shadows, weather. Analysis tools often spot fakes, and advanced AIs do it even better — even when the fake comes from them. Like in photography: you can’t pass digital for analog.
Recreating a full “Alton Barnes Cloud” scenario today would take a lot more than a quick trick.
Robert Hulse and David Cayton visit the 2018 Bishops Cannings crop circle
In this film, Robert Hulse looks closely at stem condition. It was the first genuinely interesting formation in years.
Across the formation, the stems at the nodes bend left, right, and along the axis — a pattern
closely matching the natural lodging that William photographed in 2023 in a French field
affected by strong winds.
See Part 26 of his book, which highlights the same disposition of laid stems.
Both examples exhibit the same triple-directional scheme observed in wind-flattened crops,
offering a useful comparison between natural forces and crop-circle formations.
Board Marks – The Proof
Uffington, Oxfordshire (2006)
This film by Robert Hulse, “Board Marks – The Proof”, shows the marks left by stomping boards used to flatten cereal stems in man-made formations.
These marks typically appear about ten hours after board impact and show as a fine white line,
visible only on unripe green crop.
This demonstration provides a concrete way to distinguish formations made by human means from
those that show no signs of mechanical shock.
The crop circle appeared well away from the phenomenon’s usual “epicentre” in Wiltshire.
For more on spotting board-made formations, see our page:
HOW TO SPOT FAKERY IN CROP CIRCLES.
Farmer Albert Bull (1990): two vertical “tubes” in a field
Testimony of an English farmer: two “perfectly straight” vertical columns appearing one after the other, visible for several minutes. Some see a possible link with crop-circle formation.
On an overcast day, Albert Bull observed two vertical “tubes” forming in his field one after the other:
first at close range, then in the opposite corner. At their base, dust and debris rotated in a ring at high
speed without being drawn upward. The columns—straight, with a constant cross-section—remained visible for
several minutes before dissipating. Having worked this land for decades, Bull says he had never seen anything like it.
Commentators have suggested an energy-beam hypothesis: when defocused it could produce such columns; when focused,
it might press cereals flat (a hypothesis often mentioned regarding some crop circles). A possible polarization
effect is also noted (the impression of “seeing through” the base).
Watch on YouTube: “Farmer Albert Bull witnessed two 1000 ft vertical tubes in a field ~ possible crop circle connection”.
Chilbolton & Crabwood (2001–2002)
Paul Vigay's decoding
Two formations that have become iconic: a « halftone » face near Chilbolton in 2001, followed in 2002 at Crabwood by an alien head accompanied by a « CD » carrying a binary ASCII message that Paul Vigay attempted to decode.
Our view: for us, the alien head is part of a staged scene, an orchestrated diversion. See our investigation in the series « 2001, The Odyssey of an Answer ».
2001 — Chilbolton (Hampshire):
near the radio telescope, a formation that initially appears « chaotic »
reveals, in low-angle sunlight, a face created using a halftone-like technique.
Three days later, a « data strip » appears,
recalling the Arecibo message of 1974,
but containing major differences:
emphasis on silicon, a large-headed humanoid,
a variation in the DNA helix, a different planetary location,
replacement of the telescope image, etc.
2002 — Crabwood (near Winchester):
an alien head accompanied by a CD-like disc
carrying a binary message.
By analysing the structure in bytes,
Paul Vigay reads the following in ASCII:
« Beware the bearers of false gifts and their broken promises.
Much pain but still time. There is good out there.
We oppose deception. Conduit closing. ».
These episodes continue to fuel debate:
a sophisticated non-human response
or a particularly elaborate hoax?
Oliver Castle (1996): investigating a controversial video
A cult sequence: two “balls of light” sweep over a field just before a crop circle appears at Oliver Castle. Long dismissed as a “hoax,” the video still fuels a sharp debate.
This now-classic clip shows two “balls of light” crossing a field before a crop circle suddenly appears at Oliver Castle.
Long presented as a “hoax” by National Geographic and others, it remains at the center of an intense debate.
In this YouTube video (“NG crop circle UFO debunking: debunked”), Chris Everard and other commenters point out that:
• National Geographic did not show the full original footage, but a shortened, edited excerpt.
• The “pseudo-scientific” arguments used to discredit the clip are disputed (insufficient CGI in 1999, biological/electromagnetic indicators observed in genuine formations, eyewitness accounts, 3D artists’ opinions).
• Subtle details — such as a communication band between the lights — are highlighted by researchers and filmmakers.
Bottom line: more than a decade on, the video is still a major flashpoint between skeptics and enthusiasts.
For some, it’s an edit; for others, it’s one of the rare recordings of the phenomenon in action.
Watch the video and comments: “NG crop circle UFO debunking: debunked” — Accidental Protégé (24 Feb 2012).
Pat Delgado — Operation Blackbird (BBC)
Extract from a BBC TV interview with Pat Delgado during the first night of Operation Blackbird, an official project monitoring crop circles in the UK. Faced with a journalist trying to push the topic toward aliens or the paranormal...
...Delgado remains cautious: he refers to an unexplained energy, a kind of control still poorly understood but, in his view, real.
A revealing example of how mainstream media already handled the phenomenon.
During this BBC broadcast, the journalist insists on framing the event as something “strange,” even extraterrestrial.
Delgado, more reserved, points out that traditional physics seems to have reached its limits — and that the phenomenon may be driven by a form of natural or intelligent energy not yet identified.
Our dossier "The story behind the phenomenon" covers Operation Blackbird in greater detail.
Kenichi Kanazawa
Japanese cymatics artist Kenichi Kanazawa creates geometric patterns by vibrating steel plates
coated with sand or metal powder. The shapes emerge according to sound frequency (standing waves).
Online video: YouTube.
Kenichi Kanazawa

The plate vibrates, the sand rearranges, and stable patterns appear at each frequency. Click the image to play the video.
Hosted video : on our site.
Discovering the Tridactyls
Presenting The Scientific Research Findings to the World
Website: tridactyls.org
In September and November 2023, the tridactyl specimens were presented in historic hearings before the Mexican Congress, and in November 2024, before the Peruvian Congress, with the participation of leading scientists: Ricardo Rangel, Dr. José Zalce, Dr. David Ruiz Vela, Dr. John McDowell, Josh McDowell, Dr. Hernández, Dr. Zúñiga, Dr. Irvin Zúñiga, supported by the investigative work of Jaime Maussan, Jois Mantilla, Jesús Alberto Tlaxcalteco, Giorgio Piacenza and Gonzalo Chavez. These presentations marked a milestone in scientific research, bringing these unprecedented findings to the global stage. This website aims to share our scientific evidence and raw medical files to promote transparency and advance research.
SPECIAL UFO & EXTRATERRESTRIAL
A pilot and an expert from the National Center share their experience.
Do UFOs really exist? What do extraterrestrials look like? Why have some cases remained classified?
To mark the release of the film VALENSOLE 1965, LEGEND presents a special UFO episode featuring guest Jean-Jacques Velasco, former director of the French government’s UFO research group for 27 years.
Other guests include filmmaker and pilot Éric Magnan, who recounts the details of his own UFO encounter, and the great-niece of Maurice Masse, the man who saw a UFO in Valensole in 1965.
UNEXPLAINED RURAL BRAIDING
"I just watched this woman braiding her grass, and it got me thinking...
... Most of the crop circles considered “genuine” feature braided stalks. This video is clearly sped up — so how long would it really take to braid some of these formations well enough to pass a fake off as real?"
Aliens and Espionage: Crop Circles and CIA Cover-Up
Overall interesting, but there was something more recent than the 1974 Arecibo radio message! There was the Evpatoria one from 2001.
In 1974, a group of scientists sent a coded message toward the Hercules constellation, intended for potential extraterrestrial civilizations. Considered merely a technological demonstration, no one truly expected a reply. Yet, 27 years later, an unexpected event occurred: a response appears to have been received.
UNEXPLAINED ATMOSPHERIC PHENOMENON
Captured in July 2025, this astonishing footage may show a rare example of ball lightning, a phenomenon still largely unexplained. Eyewitnesses describe a fireball floating in the air, just after a powerful lightning strike.
On July 3, 2025, a couple in Alberta (Canada) captured a strange sight on camera: a fireball hovering about 20 feet (6 meters) above the ground right after a violent lightning strike.
“After a strong lightning bolt, we saw a ball of fire just float in the air,” said eyewitness Ed Pardy. “It stayed there, round and steady.”
The phenomenon, often linked by scientists to ball lightning, remains mysterious and extremely difficult to reproduce.
A meteorologist interviewed in the report confirmed that such events are “extremely rare” and might provide clues about poorly understood forms of atmospheric energy.
TRANSIENT LUMINOUS EVENT – FROM SPACE
In July 2025, astronaut Nichole “Vapor” Ayers captured a rare event from the ISS: a gigantic jet, also known as a sprite, above a thunderstorm over Mexico and the United States.
Sprites, or Transient Luminous Events (TLEs), are rare flashes of light that appear above thunderstorms, in the upper atmosphere.
They are visible only for a brief moment, usually from space or from select observation points on the ground. Their fleeting nature and high altitude (up to 90 km) make them very difficult to study.
Nichole Ayers’ photo was praised by the scientific community. It shows a perfectly centered gigantic jet, proving that exceptional conditions — and thousands of attempts — are sometimes needed to capture such a phenomenon.
This image reinforces the idea that certain rare luminous events still elude modern scientific understanding.
EASTFIELD TO OARE – DRONE FLIGHT 4K
Remarkable aerial footage over the crop circle region between Eastfield and Oare, in the Vale of Pewsey (Wiltshire).
This is where the Galaxy of Milk Hill appeared in 2001.
This high-definition drone flight, filmed at dusk, offers an exceptional overview of the Vale of Pewsey, an iconic area of Wiltshire. According to the videographer, the footage captures, among other features:
The videographer notes that landmarks seemed to emerge spontaneously during the flight, as if a "view from above" was guiding the camera toward significant locations.
Note: According to the filmmaker, this territory is among the richest in “authentic” formations since 1990. The video could be a valuable reference for geographically locating the phenomenon’s “central hub”.
CHILBOLTON OBSERVATORY – UK SPACE MONITORING
The Chilbolton Observatory, opened in 1967, plays a key role in atmospheric and space observations in the UK. This is where the mysterious Face of Chilbolton appeared in a nearby field in 2001.
This facility hosts instruments such as a 25-meter steerable radar and the UK station of the LOFAR radio telescope network.
The Chilbolton Observatory, located in Hampshire and managed by the STFC, includes various systems for atmospheric research, satellite tracking, radio frequencies, and astronomy. It remains a strategic site for British science.
However, in 2001, nearby fields gained international attention after two of the most astonishing crop circles appeared there: the famous Face and the binary message, allegedly a response to the Arecibo signal sent in 1974. The close proximity between these formations and the Chilbolton antennas continues to intrigue researchers, enthusiasts, and skeptics alike.
1191 – CONFESSIONS OF A CROP CIRCLE MAKER
A rare testimony from behind the scenes of the phenomenon.
In this intriguing account, Citizen D, a former crop circle maker in the Wessex fields (England), shares revelations that challenge all conventional beliefs about the phenomenon.
For over forty years, crop circles have sparked intense debates: art, hoax, or messages from another dimension? Citizen D asserts that they are neither extraterrestrial nor simple human pranks, but the result of invisible forces acting through people.
According to him, some makers experience strange compulsions, uncanny time synchronizations, ghostly visions — as if guided by an external force.
Now retired and a writer, he reveals through anonymous testimonies that the boundary between creation and creator is becoming blurred. Crop circles might be a mirror between human consciousness and the unknown.
In short: this testimony presents a hybrid perspective. Crop circles may be human in execution, but not necessarily in origin. The makers would be channels, not initiators. It's no longer about a hoax or alien contact — but about altered reality, influenced consciousness, and inhabited creation.
RUPERT SHELDRAKE – THE SCIENCE DELUSION
A now-censored TEDx talk, considered too subversive for mainstream science.
In this talk, Rupert Sheldrake, a rebellious biologist, questions ten dogmas of modern science. First aired at TEDx Whitechapel (2013), the video was removed under pressure from American rationalists and later reclassified with a warning by TED.
Sheldrake promotes the idea of a living science, open to consciousness and non-local memory (morphic resonance).
For a more visual and enjoyable version:
👉 Watch this illustrated version on YouTube
➕ Official site: sheldrake.org
TERENCE MEADEN
Physicist Terence Meaden presents his theory on how crop circles are formed.
He discusses the idea that atmospheric vortices might be responsible for these formations in the fields.
NICK NICHOLSON & PETER SORENSEN
1996. Nick Nicholson and Peter Sorensen share their perspective on the crop circle phenomenon.
Sitting outside the Barge Inn late one evening, they talk about what might lie behind these formations.
Unfortunately, the producer added background music and visual effects, which interferes with the experience.
Note: the video says the Barge Inn is in Pewsey, but it's actually in Honeystreet, near Alton Barnes.
CROP CIRCLES THE HIDDEN TRUTH

An excellent résumé of the situation as it was back in 2009, when this discussion between Robert Hulse, David Cayton and Richard Hall took place.
We are for the most part in total agreement with the opinions being presented here, especially as in most cases these are backed up with facts and evidence. The only point where we would differ is where right at the beginning Robert and David state, when asked by Richard Hall what countries the crop circles are appearing in, that they are appearing all over the world. We would take issue with this as we believe that the genuine phenomenon is for the great majority of the time confined to the English counties of Wiltshire, Hampshire and Kent, above the chalk aquifers present below soil level in these regions.
Crop circleS of 2002 & 2003

Peter Sorensen's filming over the fields of Wiltshire during the 2002 and 2003 crop circle seasons.
His aerial views of the 2003 North Down 'Sun' are stunning, its really worth freezing the film, full screen, at 32 mins 42 secs to appreciate the enormity of the task if this were to be even attempted by a hoaxing team. This is the crop circle which features in the Culture-crop video 'When Chance Becomes Entangled' and discussed here in chapter 4 of the 'Crop Circle Adventure'.
THE STARS ALIGHT
THE CROP CIRCLES OF 1997

Peter Sorensen's filming over the fields of Wiltshire during the 1997 crop circle season.
His aerial views of the 2003 North Down 'Sun' are stunning, its really worth freezing the film, full screen, at 32 mins 42 secs to appreciate the enormity of the task if this were to be even attempted by a hoaxing team. This is the crop circle which features in the Culture-crop video 'When Chance Becomes Entangled' and discussed here in chapter 4 of the 'Crop Circle Adventure'.
The Crop Circles of 1996,
'Valentines from GOD'

Peter Sorensen was on the ground and in the air in Wiltshire England,...
filming the crop circles for most of the 1990's, and this year, 1996, is a very special year for the crop circle story as we have arrived at the moment of the appearance of the great Julia Set formations of Stonehenge and Windmill Hill. Sorensen's videos are exceptional as they document real lives lived around the crop circles thirty years ago, and they are a beautiful snap-shot of the period, a time we will never see again.
As noted in the information below the video the film is of 'YouTube quality', meaning not as good as the original. You are however invited to buy a copy of the original DVD version direct from Peter Sorensen at his email address. Just a caveat here; as it has been many years since I have been in touch with Peter Sorensen I am not up to date with his present personal circumstances, so its worth checking by email first before ordering.
GÖBEKLI TEPE PUSHES BACK
THE AGE OF ANCIENT KNOWLEDGE

A researcher recently discovered what he believes to be humanity’s first calendar at the ancient site of Göbekli Tepe (...) In his study, he states that the V-shaped marks on the lunisolar calendar—which combines the movements of the moon and the sun—recorded a major astronomical event that had a huge impact on Earth...
WE'VE BEEN LIED TO — AND THIS OBJECT PROVES IT!
The Antikythera Mechanism by Mathias Buttet

In this interview, Mathias Buttet (Director of R&D at Hublot) shares his passion and his investigation into the Antikythera Mechanism—a Greek device discovered in 1901 in a shipwreck dating back to around 200 BC.
This “first calculator” of humanity used a complex system of gears to predict astronomical phenomena: lunar cycles, eclipses, planetary positions, and famous cycles like Metonic (19 years) and Saros (18 years).
Buttet explains how the mechanism anticipates and calculates these cycles with exceptional mechanical precision, sometimes even surpassing modern watchmakers. The device intrigues by its technological advancement and isolation (no equivalent has been found), raising questions about the loss of ancient knowledge.
The video also explores the transmission and disappearance of knowledge, respect for the ancients, and the mystery surrounding the origin of this expertise. It also explains how Hublot recreated this mechanism as a modern watch, emphasizing the importance of preserving such heritage. Finally, the discussion highlights the parallels between these cycles and astronomical markers found at sites like Stonehenge, showing that this level of knowledge was mastered thousands of years ago.
Why this matters:
The Antikythera Mechanism proves that the ancients were able to identify and predict complex cycles through careful observation and technique—long before modern science. This knowledge, sometimes forgotten, echoes current questions about cycles (like Metonic or Saros) in our understanding of crop circles and sacred astronomy.
Joe Rogan Experience #2327
AJ Gentile

Joe Rogan Experience (May 27, 2025) with AJ Gentile, creator of the channel The Why Files, specializing in strange stories blending mystery, skepticism, and humor. The topic of crop circles is discussed.
Who is AJ Gentile?
Former TV professional turned YouTuber after the pandemic.
Unique style: captivating narratives on the unexplained (aliens, lost civilizations, conspiracy theories) with a touch of humor and a half-curious, half-skeptical stance.
Operation Highjump
Military mission in Antarctica post-WWII, led by Admiral Byrd.
Theories: green landscapes in Antarctica, strange creatures, flying saucers, underground city.
Gentile acknowledges the fictional aspect but highlights gray areas like the 3-hour radio blackout.
HAARP and Project Blue Beam
HAARP: officially for ionosphere studies, suspected of being an energy weapon.
Blue Beam: fake celestial apparitions (Messiah, UFOs) projected to impose a global government.
Gentile questions the feasibility of holograms, but remains open due to tech advancements.
Underwater bases & UAPs
Rumors of underwater bases (e.g., off Malibu), blurred on Google Maps.
Theory: UAPs come from the oceans, not space.
Hypothesis of a parallel civilization evolving secretly.
Crop Circles
Gentile was skeptical, but found:
– Physical anomalies (stems altered by microwaves, metallic spheres).
– Military operations to discredit researchers.
– Mirage Men mentioned: ufology manipulation by agencies.
(The term "Mirage Men" was popularized by Mark Pilkington, a British writer and researcher specialized in ufology and disinformation. He is the author of the 2010 book Mirage Men: An Adventure into Paranoia, Espionage, Psychological Warfare, and UFOs.)
He defends a minority of authentic cases, concentrated in areas like Wiltshire.
Forgotten civilizations
Example: the alleged Egyptian city in the Grand Canyon (Kinkaid case).
Sites like Baalbek, Malta, Cappadocia: technically unexplained remains.
The Moon: artificial satellite?
Theory that the Moon was "placed" by an advanced civilization.
Shape, size, distance: too perfect?
It could be hollow or harbor secrets.
To be continued